In The News
Upcoming Events
Galil Medical Image-Guided Cryoablation
   
 
OnDemand Media Center Follow-up Care after Image-Guided Renal Cryoablation
 
 

Home  |  Press Releases  |  About Galil Medical  |  Investor Relations  |  Contacts  |  Customer Support

   

IMAGE-GUIDED
CRYOABLATION

RENAL TUMOR

Interventional Radiology
Ablation Technologies

Technological Advances in
Minimally Invasive Procedures

Cryosurgery Procedures

Treatment

Treatment Success Rate

Treatment Side Effects

Follow-up Care

Case Study

Publications / References

Clinical Sites / Studies

FAQs

LIVER METASTASIS

Liver Metastasis Cryosurgery

Liver Metastasis Statistics

Patient Criteria

Overview

Symptoms

Cryosurgery Procedures

Case Study

Publications / References

Clinical Sites / Studies

FAQs

PROSTATE CANCER
CRYOTHERAPY

KIDNEY CANCER
CRYOTHERAPY

CRYOABLATION
TECHNOLOGY

CRYOABLATION
PRODUCTS

 

IMAGE-GUIDED CRYOABLATION

RENAL TUMOR — Cryosurgery Procedures

 

Follow-Up Care after Image-Guided Renal Cryoablation

Currently, definitions of the appropriate length of follow-up and timing of post-procedure testing and imaging are not well established. Given that the tumors are treated in-situ and not surgically excised, a rigorous follow-up protocol is required. Ongoing surveillance should be carefully planned so as to evaluate the efficacy of treatment as well as to monitor for disease recurrence. A typical follow-up imaging schedule follows, and may be revised at the discretion of the Interventionalist and/or other care team member(s) per institution protocol.

• First scan (MRI or CT) at 24-hours post-ablation or at 7-10 day post-procedure office visit.

• Scan at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-procedure.

• Scan at 6 month intervals during the second year post-procedure.

• Yearly scans performed thereafter.


The cryolesion on follow-up CT or MRI should show no evidence of enhancement, and the ablated tumor should show stable size or a decrease in size.

In many cases, physicians use CT rather than MRI for follow-up scans because of its lower cost and because it is more readily available. However, there are some tumors that show up better on MRI, and MRI may then be the better choice for follow-up of these lesions. Also, if a patient underwent MRI-guided ablation, follow-up with MRI scans allows the physician to directly compare follow-up images with the intraprocedural scans to better understand and interpret the findings. For example, if a follow-up scan shows an area of enhancement that would normally be suspicious for residual tumor, a correlation with intraprocedural MR images will ascertain whether or not the portion in question was treated during the cryoablation procedure.

It is possible that follow-up protocol will evolve as cryoablation and imaging technology advances.

  

     
 
 
 

© 2007 Galil Medical. All rights reserved.
Site Map | Disclaimers—Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Glossary | Standard Terms & Conditions | Corporate Compliance | Employees | Physicians
In The News | Upcoming Events | Patient Resources | OnDemand Media Center
Website Design by DDA Medical